Apple M3 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Apple M3 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 8 / 8 | 20 / 20 | — |
| Boost clock (GHz) | 4.1 | 5.5 | — |
| Single-core score | 3,050 | 3,050 | +0.0% |
| Multi-core score | 11,700 | 18,000 | -35.0% |
| TDP (W) | 22 | 125 | — |
- Apple M3 is faster than Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 0.0% in single-core and slower by 35.0% in multi-core.
- Apple M3 also draws less power (22W vs 125W).
Verdict: M3 or Ultra 7 265K?
Apple M3 advantages
- Power efficiency (+82%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K advantages
- Multi-core speed (+35%)
- Peak clock (+26%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Apple M3 if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build.
- Choose the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Apple M3 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: which should you choose?
Apple M3 — 8-core / 8-thread Apple laptop processor (2023) with a boost clock of 4.05 GHz and 22 W TDP.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K — 20-core / 20-thread Intel desktop processor (2024) with a boost clock of 5.5 GHz and 125 W TDP.
Apple M3 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads in multi-core performance. Apple M3 is faster than Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 0.0% in single-core and slower by 35.0% in multi-core. Apple M3 also draws less power (22W vs 125W).
Gaming and single-threaded work
Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Apple M3 leads there with a single-core score of 3,050 versus 3,050, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.
Content creation and multitasking
For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is stronger, posting 18,000 multi-core against 11,700. Its 20 cores and 20 threads give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.
Power and platform
The Apple M3 is the more efficient chip at 22 W versus 125 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Apple M3 better than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K takes the overall edge, though Apple M3 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Apple M3 is faster than Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 0.0% in single-core and slower by 35.0% in multi-core.
What is the main difference between the Apple M3 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?
Apple M3 is faster than Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 0.0% in single-core and slower by 35.0% in multi-core. Apple M3 also draws less power (22W vs 125W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Apple M3 if you want a cooler, quieter and more power-efficient build. Choose the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K if you render video, compile code or run heavy multitasking.
Methodology
Each processor is scored on a normalized benchmark index aggregating single-core and multi-core results. Single-core predicts responsiveness and gaming; multi-core predicts throughput in rendering and compilation. We also report cores/threads, boost clock and TDP.