Processor Comparison

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Apple M3

Verdict
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Apple M3: Apple M3 leads in multi-core performance

Head-to-head specifications

MetricIntel Core i5-13400FApple M3Difference
Cores / threads10 / 168 / 8
Boost clock (GHz)4.64.1
Single-core score2,5003,050-18.0%
Multi-core score11,00011,700-6.0%
TDP (W)6522
  • Intel Core i5-13400F is slower than Apple M3 by 18.0% in single-core and slower by 6.0% in multi-core.
  • Apple M3 draws less power (22W vs 65W).

Verdict: i5-13400F or M3?

Our recommendation
Apple M3 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Intel Core i5-13400F advantages

  • Peak clock (+12%)

Apple M3 advantages

  • Single-core speed (+18%)
  • Multi-core speed (+6%)
  • Power efficiency (+66%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Intel Core i5-13400F if you want the highest peak clocks.
  • Choose the Apple M3 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Apple M3: which should you choose?

Intel Core i5-13400F — 10-core / 16-thread Intel desktop processor (2023) with a boost clock of 4.6 GHz and 65 W TDP.

Apple M3 — 8-core / 8-thread Apple laptop processor (2023) with a boost clock of 4.05 GHz and 22 W TDP.

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Apple M3: Apple M3 leads in multi-core performance. Intel Core i5-13400F is slower than Apple M3 by 18.0% in single-core and slower by 6.0% in multi-core. Apple M3 draws less power (22W vs 65W).

Gaming and single-threaded work

Games and everyday responsiveness lean on single-core speed. The Apple M3 leads there with a single-core score of 3,050 versus 2,500, so it is the marginally better pick for high-refresh gaming — though at typical resolutions the GPU usually decides frame rates.

Content creation and multitasking

For rendering, compilation, video export and other all-core workloads, the Apple M3 is stronger, posting 11,700 multi-core against 11,000. Its 8 cores and 8 threads give it real headroom for heavy parallel jobs.

Power and platform

The Apple M3 is the more efficient chip at 22 W versus 65 W, which means less heat, quieter cooling and lower running costs under sustained load.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the processor comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Intel Core i5-13400F better than the Apple M3?

Apple M3 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Intel Core i5-13400F is slower than Apple M3 by 18.0% in single-core and slower by 6.0% in multi-core.

What is the main difference between the Intel Core i5-13400F and the Apple M3?

Intel Core i5-13400F is slower than Apple M3 by 18.0% in single-core and slower by 6.0% in multi-core. Apple M3 draws less power (22W vs 65W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Intel Core i5-13400F if you want the highest peak clocks. Choose the Apple M3 if you mainly game or want snappy everyday responsiveness.

Methodology

Each processor is scored on a normalized benchmark index aggregating single-core and multi-core results. Single-core predicts responsiveness and gaming; multi-core predicts throughput in rendering and compilation. We also report cores/threads, boost clock and TDP.

MC
Marcus Chen
Hardware & Product Analyst

Marcus benchmarks processors, GPUs, phones and vehicles and maintains normalized performance databases.

MSc Computer Engineering10+ years review experience
✓ Reviewed by Priya Nair, Data Quality Reviewer.
Last updated 2026-05-15
Intel Core i5-13400F profile → Apple M3 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons